Understanding Ostrich Revenue Model
Ostrich does not function as a liquidity layer like traditional DEXs. Instead, its revenue model is based entirely on Payment for Order Flow (PFOF)—a model widely used in traditional finance and recently adapted for crypto.
Payment for Order Flow (PFOF) is a revenue model where Ostrich receives compensation for routing user trades to designated execution partners—such as centralized exchanges or market makers. These partners share a portion of the fee with Ostrich for each order executed through the platform.
PFOF became widespread as many brokers transitioned to commission-free trading, relying on payments from market makers for order flow. Today, it remains a key revenue source for many retail trading platforms.
Ostrich is adapting this approach to crypto by integrating with multiple off-chain and on-chain venues (CEXs, MM desks, liquidity providers) and routing user orders in a way that maximizes fill efficiency and earns small per-trade rebates.
Ostrich doesn’t act as a market maker or hold liquidity; it’s a routing and execution interface, collecting small margins via PFOF while focusing on UI/UX, advanced analytics, and trade automation.
When a trader places an order through a broker:
Order Routing: Instead of going directly to an exchange, the order is sent to a market maker or liquidity provider.
Execution: PFOF partners fill the order, profiting from the bid-ask spread or other trading strategies.
Payment: The market maker shares a portion of fee as brokerage for routing the order, providing the broker with a revenue stream beyond commissions.
This process helps market makers maintain liquidity and manage inventory by ensuring a steady flow of orders.
Improved Liquidity: Market makers receiving order flow can provide better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads.
Better Execution Prices: In some cases, market makers may offer prices slightly better than the public exchange’s best bid or offer.
Smart routing: Orders are routed to venues that offer tight spreads and high fill rates.
No slippage from internal liquidity: Since Ostrich doesn’t maintain its own pools, trades are executed externally where liquidity is deepest.
PFOF has been controversial in traditional finance due to conflicts of interest—e.g., brokers routing orders to maximize fees instead of best execution.
Ostrich mitigates this by:
Routing orders based on best fill price and reliability, not just PFOF incentives.
Ensuring prices meet or beat market standards like the National Best Bid and Offer (NBBO) equivalent in crypto.
If you place a market order to buy $1,000 of ETH via Ostrich:
Ostrich sends the order to an execution partner (say, Binance or GSR).
The partner fills the order and pays Ostrich a fee (e.g., 0.05% of trade size = $0.50).
You receive your ETH without paying any explicit fee.
Ostrich earns via PFOF without affecting your execution price.
In crypto, fragmented liquidity and high retail participation create ideal conditions for PFOF-based execution engines. Ostrich monetizes trading intent, not liquidity provision, allowing it to scale without managing capital or inventory.
Over time, Ostrich aims to build institutional-grade order routing, capturing more volume while keeping the platform completely free to use for retail and pros alike.